SMH vs BND ETF Comparison

Compare SMH and BND side-by-side — including expense ratio, yield, holdings count, index exposure, and portfolio overlap analysis.

Key Differences

Feature SMH BND
Expense Ratio 0.35% 0.03%
Dividend Yield 0.3% 3.9%
Holdings 25 11,000+
Index Tracked MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index
Inception Date 2011-12-20 2007-04-03

SMH vs BND: Which Is Better?

SMH and BND are both widely used by ETF investors, but they serve different portfolio roles depending on diversification goals, sector exposure, and long-term strategy.

SMH is designed for investors seeking semiconductor industry exposure and tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It is commonly used in portfolios focused on technology allocations.

BND is designed for investors seeking broad US investment-grade bonds exposure and tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. It is commonly used in portfolios focused on intermediate core bond allocations.

Portfolio Overlap

Understanding how much SMH and BND overlap in their underlying holdings is key to evaluating whether combining them adds diversification or creates redundancy in your portfolio.

Analyze SMH vs BND overlap

Explore More Tools

📊

Overlap Calculator

See exactly which holdings SMH and BND share and the weighted overlap percentage.

Analyze overlap
🔎

Research SMH & BND

Research ETF returns, holdings, sector and country exposure, and the latest ETF-related news.

Research SMH Research BND
Premium
🎯

Portfolio Builder

Generate a diversified ETF portfolio based on your goals, risk tolerance, and investment timeline.

See how it works

Related ETF Comparisons

Analyze Your ETF Portfolio

Compare holdings, detect overlap, and optimize diversification — completely free.

Launch Overlap Analyzer